Thursday, October 3, 2013

Job 26:7 In Honor of NASA's Shutdown

NASA is shutdown this week. There will be no proving Einstein's relativity or searching for aliens on public funds. In honor of this occasion I will do a little interpretation of Job 26:7.

Against modern thought Sacred Scripture emphatically and inerrantly teaches that space is nothing. There is no such thing as space. Space is not a physical object, spiritual object or Divine object. Space has no Form. Objects or phenomenon such as gravity do not interact with space since space refers to nothing. Just a concept!  The structure of space does not modify since there is no structure. Space does not expand, stretch, warp, inflate or behave in any manner whatsoever since space refers to nothing. Space does not move; rather objects move. Space cannot be explored or measured since it is a non-entity. Space is not a bloody medium! God did not create space. God creates objects, not concepts that refer to nothing in existence such as space. Space is a static concept that relates distances between objects such as the Sun and the Earth.

Since space is nothing the concept that Universe has a shape is idiotic. Universe has no shape. There are no bounds to the Universe. No bounds equals no shape.

The Earth is not revolving around the Sun on a physical spacetime structure like a ball rolling on a roulette table. The Earth is 'suspended' on nothing just as the sacred prophet wrote in the Book of Job. Job 26:7 is one of those very rare instances of the Sacred Script that teaches physics. The space is nothing proposal is taught and validated by God Himself. Verse 26:7 of Job is more than enough to correct and destroy the proposals of modern physics and cosmology. Heck, the reason of a ten year old is enough to correct them.

But in any case Job 26:7 corrects some of Einstein's foolish thought and refutes the Big-Bang hypothesis. One stroke of the sacred author's stylus on bark destroys modern physical cosmology, its false assumptions and condemns all the exploitation of public funds. Those who wasted billions of other people's money on foolish projects such as the Gravity B probe, WMAP, COBE, and Planck will have to answer for it. Those who idolize Einstein will have to bow down to Job. In the future the poor in spirit and the meek will sit down and teach the rich and arrogant mainstream scientists.

Translations of Job 26:7

qui extendit aquilonem super vacuum et adpendit terram super nihili (Vulgate)
He stretched out the north over the empty space, and hangeth the earth on nothing (DRV)
​​​​​​​He spreads out the northern skies over empty space; ​​​​​​he suspends the earth on nothing (NET)
He stretches out the north wind upon nothing, and he upon nothing hangs the earth;
He stretches out the North over empty space, and suspends the earth over nothing at all (NAB)
He it was who spread the North above the void and poised the earth on nothingness. (NJB)
stretching-out north over chaos hanging earth on without what? (Hebrew interlinear CHES 2.0)

I like the CHES 2.0 Hebrew interlinear version. The Hebrew suggests that space is without what or without whateness. Space is no what, rather it is all where.  Space is discovered to be nothing at all.  It is all conceptual. Without physical objects in existence space could not even be conceived of. Einstein was confused about gravity and took a short cut. He converted space into a thing that a phenomenon modifies. He reified space like the ancients reified love and war into gods.

The Physical Mediators of Gravity

So if the Earth is suspended over nothing how does it remain tied to the Sun? Even Newton had no suggestion for this riddle. He was content to give up:

Hitherto I have not been able to discover the cause of those properties of gravity from phenomena, and I frame no hypotheses, for whatever is not deduced from the phenomena is to be called an hypothesis; and hypotheses, whether metaphysical or physical, whether of occult qualities or mechanical, have no place in experimental philosophy. In this philosophy particular propositions are inferred from the phenomena, and afterwards rendered general by induction. Thus it was that the impenetrability, the mobility, and the impulsive force of bodies, and the laws of motion and of gravitation, were discovered. And to us it is enough that gravity does really exist, and act according to the laws which we have explained, and abundantly serves to account for all the motions of the celestial bodies, and of our sea. —Isaac Newton

What is the physical mediator that ties the Earth to the Sun allowing her to swing around? That is the question that everyone wants to know.  Einstein proposed his mystical spacetime structure with gravitational waves. The mechanics propose their discrete gravitons. The string theorists propose chain mail comprised of 1D strings.

As for me I hold to Gaede's Rope Hypothesis. He supposes all the atoms of the Sun are physically connected to all the atoms of the Earth by continuous rope like entity comprised of an electric thread and a magnetic thread. The EM ropes reconfigure to form and contain the atoms themselves. The Earth is bound to the Sun via the taut EM ropes and swings around the Sun preserving momentum. The length of the EM ropes is the distance between the the Earth and the Sun. In reality space has nothing to do with this interaction. Here is a visualization of the mechanism using Earth and the Moon:

The EM ropes generate gravity through numbers . . . 

When two spheres are close
together, the number of effective
ropes is greater than when they
are far apart. This mechanism
explains the inverse square factor
in Newton’s equation. (Gaede: from WGDE)

At great distances the EM ropes superimpose. The ropes do not tangle since EM rope is able to pass through EM rope, a property called light on light. At shorter distances the ropes fan out and there is stronger attraction. At even shorter distances even more ropes fan out. The EM ropes are also supposed to mediate light phenomenon: rectilinearly.

I have closely studied Gaede's EM Rope Hypothesis and Thread Theory in his book where he introduces his physics to the public called Why God Doesn't Exist (I know it is ironic for me). It is sound, sane and rational. His model of the atoms is genius. He built off of centuries of work done by selfless scientists. This is no pseudo-science or fringe theory. He is surgical with Newton's equations and dismantles quantum mechanics and relativity. It is a joy to read.

Physics has nothing to do with personal convictions, truth, evidence, proofs, mysteries, or even Sacred Scripture except in very rare instances. Ideally the observer is killed in a scientific context. Physics proposes rational assumptions and possible explanations. In the scientific Method you define, make a statement of facts in a rational assumption, explain rationally and conclude. Their is no provision for personal beliefs in physics but nonetheless when you go home after receiving the presentation you have to decide what you are going to hold to and use in life. I use Gaede's EM Rope Hypothesis and Thread Theory.

And now I will be bold. I am going to suggest that these physical mediators are perhaps implied by God in the same Book of Job. This is taken from a sequence where God speaks to Job. Job had these words of God recorded by his servants on bark:

​​​​​​​Can you tie the bands of the Pleiades, ​​​​​​or release the cords of Orion? (Job 38:)

The bands tying the cluster of stars called the Pleiades and the cords of drawing the star cluster Orion are the EM rope mediators connecting all the atoms of the Universe. The galaxies are connected via superimposed EM ropes. They either move away or move toward one another and this has nothing to do with space moving or gravity warping space. Gaede fairly-simply explains the redshift and blueshift of galaxies using his EM Rope hypothesis (find his articles online).

My tentative personal belief is that God created the single closed loop of thread from nothing and wove it the EM rope, atoms, stars and all physical bodies. Gaede is right in his assumption and theory. Modern mainstream cosmology and physics is wrong. And the Bible is inerrant in those very rare occasions where it proposes a physics.

You need ropes to pull a ship into harbor :)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.