Friday, November 1, 2013

The Nebular Hypothesis is Dead

The nebular hypothesis is dead. And

Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.

Tautologous computer simulations and statistics cannot save the planetary scientists!!! They have failed to evolve. They are not fit to survive in science! Mother Nature is slowly disqualifying them from practicing planetary science. Soon they will be locked up and undergoing treatment for all the damage their hypothesis, evidence, and logic has done to their minds.   

Critical Thinking and Rational Analysis applied to the Science Daily article linked above:

"Kepler-78b is a planet that shouldn't exist."

Exist: object + location (something somewhere). The existence of an object does not depend upon the OPINION of an arrogant human ape, his puny sensory system, a logical system or a hypothesis that a human ape dreams up and applies to planets. Kepler-78b exists by definition. Kepler-78b had shape prior to the human apes pointing a telescope at it. The human ape with lab coat has no say in this matter. The statement of fact "a planet shouldn't exist" is the height of arrogance and folly.

"This scorching lava world circles its star every eight and a half hours at a distance of less than one million miles -- one of the tightest known orbits."

Nebular hypothesis fails to explain this phenomenon, thus it is useless on a conceptual level. Variables and computer simulations will not save the hypothesis. It fails to conceive of how this planet is locked into a 'tight' orbit without contradicting its core notion i.e. the planet formed from the same cloud of dust and gas. The law of non-contradiction destroys nebular hypothesis. Human apes have not evolved beyond the crippling use of logic for they continue to apply logic so as to prove that which is irrational, inconceivable and impossible.

"According to current theories of planet formation . . . "

Wrong use of terms. According to the current hypothesis (statement of fact in an assumption) of planet formation blah blah blah.

"it couldn't have formed so close to its star, nor could it have moved there."

This human ape is so crippled by his voluntary use of rule-based assumptions he cannot even utter a coherent sentence.

"This planet is a complete mystery," says astronomer David Latham of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA)."We don't know how it formed or how it got to where it is today."

Devolved astronomer believes in mysteries. He is practicing astrology.

"What we do know is that it's not going to last forever."

This is scientific knowledge these days. Profound wisdom for the ages.

"Kepler-78b is going to end up in the star very soon, astronomically speaking," agrees CfA astronomer Dimitar Sasselov.

To quote my colleague, "No shit Sherlock."

"Not only is Kepler-78b a mystery world, it is the first known Earth-sized planet with an Earth-like density. Kepler-78b is about 20 percent larger than Earth, with a diameter of 9,200 miles, and weighs almost twice as much. "

Not only are the human apes so crippled by their own logic they are comparing everything to the Earth as if Earth is the center of the universe. Very objective!!!!

"As a result it has a density similar to Earth's, which suggests an Earth-like composition of iron and rock."

How did that iron and rock form if not in the nebular dust and gas cloud? And where did that object come from?

"The tight orbit of Kepler-78b poses a challenge to theorists."

Your computer simulations and logic will not save YOU!!!

"When this planetary system was forming, the young star was larger than it is now."

But I thought you did not know how the planet formed so how could you assume that the system formed as one!!! A young star larger than it is now is a statement of the obvious. All stars compress.  But into what???

"As a result, the current orbit of Kepler-78b would have been inside the swollen star."

An orbit refers to a concept. Orbit is an abstract of motion. Motion and orbits are verbs. They do not exist. Verbs cannot BE inside a swollen star!!! Sweet Jesus save us from the planet of the apes.

"It couldn't have formed in place because you can't form a planet inside a star."

Premise A

"It couldn't have formed further out and migrated inward, because it would have migrated all the way into the star."

Premise B

'This planet is an enigma," explains Sasselov.'

Conclusion.  The nebular hypothesis pursues an explanation that is contradictory.  This ape derived from nebular hypothesis . . . the conclusion that nebular hypothesis cannot be used to explain the origin and motion of planets.  And the beauty of it all is that he did not understand what he did!!!

"According to Latham, Kepler-78b is a member of a new class of planets recently identified in data from NASA's Kepler spacecraft. These newfound worlds all orbit their stars with periods of less than 12 hours. They're also small, about the size of Earth. Kepler-78b is the first planet in the new class to have its mass measured."

Define Mass _______________

"Kepler-78b is the poster child for this new class of planets," notes Latham.

Only for devolved human apes. For evolved human apes Kepler-78b is a poster child for the assumption that all planets are compressing and cooling stars some of which are locked together into a system. Kepler-78b is a poster child for the Stellar Metamorphosis or Stellar Transformation hypothesis.

"Kepler-78b is a doomed world."

As are all worlds especially the planet of the apes. Thank you.

"Gravitational tides will draw it even closer to its star."

Gravitational tides refer to concepts. Concepts cannot perform actions such as drawing in an object. Critical Thinking 101. Only a star can draw a planet close via physical mediators connecting the two.

"Eventually it will move so close that the star's gravity will rip the world apart."

Concepts such as gravity do not disintegrate objects.  Objects such as a star rip apart objects such as a planet via continuous taut physical mediators tugging the two together at effective angles.  

"Theorists predict that Kepler-78b will vanish within three billion years."

Matter cannot convert into nothing (space).  At the current rate of human ape evolution in three billion years they will still use the logic of nebular hypothesis.

"Interestingly, our solar system could have held a planet like Kepler-78b. If it had, the planet would have been destroyed long ago leaving no signs for astronomers today."

The Sun holds in old dark stars via a taut and rectilinear physical mediators fanned out (effective angles) in a descriptive inverse square regime. Currently there are several planets like Kepler-78b held in by the Sun. These old dark stars cross galactic orbits with newer stars and lock into an inverse square system while preserving their momentum of initiation.

"Kepler-78b orbits a Sun-like G-type star located 400 light-years from Earth in the constellation Cygnus."

Thank you Data-Collectors, for your hard work (whoops I meant Astronomers).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.