Unique Property and Behavior of the Fundamental Physical Entity

When a person is introduced to Gaede's Thread Theory they tend to question the idea that Thread can pass through Thread without tangling.  How is it that the EM Ropes do not tangle?

This is a huge stumbling block for people who are introduced to Gaede's thought. Gaede devoted several pages in his book to this and people have filled up a lot of internet space discussing this issue. Speaking for myself I think perhaps Gaede could have taken a better approach. He decided to harp on the concept 'touch' but I think this is a misnomer for this context since touch is associated via human sense or interaction of macro objects. Tangle too is not even appropriate for this context. Touch and tangle can only be used as figures of speech or common language in context to the fundamental entity.

When one gets to the end of the road, one must conceive anew.  The quantum mechanics and particle physicists understand this well although I think they have made the issue too complex by their lack of tracing concepts back to hypothesized object or a single object underlying all things. But the context is radical . . . unlike anything or any relation encountered in day to day life.  So how can one answer such a question?  

A first way to approach this problem is through the history of physics. Physicists have long understood that light can pass on light and in fact you can imperfectly demonstrate this for yourself at home using two lasers or flashlights. The equivalent question in QM and PP is "How do photons avoid colliding?" Some physicists are well aware of this. Others are not. But it has enormous implications even in terms of what we call 'proton'.

Here are some quotes from some of the great physicists:

Maxwell: “ Equation (361) for the electromagnetic field is linear in the field,… this means that two waves can travel through each other without disturbing each other”

“ Here then we have two independent qualities of bodies, one by which they allow of the passage of electricity through them, and the other by which they allow of electrical action being transmitted through them without any electricity being allowed to pass.” (J. Maxwell, On Physical Lines of Force, Philosophical Magazine 21 (1861))
Huygens: “ Another property of waves of light, and one of the most marvelous, is that when some of them come from different or even from opposing sides, they produce their effect across one another without any hindrance…the waves do not destroy nor interrupt one another when they cross one another” (C. Huygens, Treatise on Light (1678) trans. S. Thompson (1912) p. 22)

Grosseteste: "Corporeity, therefore, is either light itself or the agent which performs the aforementioned operation and introduces dimensions into matter in virtue of its participation in light, and acts through the power of this same light. But the first form cannot introduce dimensions into matter through the power of a subsequent form. Therefore light is not a form subsequent to corporeity, but it is corporeity itself.

Furthermore, the first corporeal form is, in the opinion of the philosophers, more exalted and of a nobler and more excellent essence than all the forms that come after it. It bears, also, a closer resemblance to the forms that exist apart from matter. But light is more exalted and of a nobler and more excellent essence than all corporeal things. It has, moreover, greater similarity than all bodies to the forms that exist apart from matter, namely, the intelligences (i.e. Angels). Light therefore is the first corporeal form." (Robert Grosseteste, De Luce)

If the hypothesized Thread performs the dynamic concept called light conceived as torsion waves then this fundamental object or first form can superpose, overlap, pass through, intersect etc. without hindrance, interruption, disturbance, tangling, etc. It is only when we have an intersection or overlap of so much Thread at a location that another moving Thread may get disturbed, hindered, stopped, redirected, reformed, etc.  This critical overlap is exemplified by the proton which is supposed as a crisscrossing convergence of gazillions of taut and straight electric threads fed by the EM Ropes coming from all atoms of the U. And this idea of critical density* is I think EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. If it were not for this critical density, I think light, gravity, electricity, magnetism, inertial mass**, fundamental interactions, etc. would be impossible. And yet if it were not for the ability of the Thread to superpose the same phenomena would be impossible. So this is seemingly paradoxical.  

I'm reading this Nobel Laureate's book called "Lightness of Being". Notice what he says about the proton:

One the one hand the interior of a proton is a dynamic place, with things [electric axles] moving around. On the other hand all protons of everywhere and everywhen behave exactly the same way. (Wilczek, The Lightness of Being, p. 44, brackets mine)

In my interpretation protons can change location by shifting along and between the electric axles of which they are made. They are able (or have freedom) to move in the direction of all atoms of the U, the same which feeds them for their constitution. This is why on the one hand they are dynamic, and on the other hand are immutable, unable to decay or split apart, etc. At least this is a partial answer.

But can me or a Nobel Laureate or anyone offer an explanation for these seemingly miraculous properties? I don't think so. That said I think that given the context these are not miraculous properties and behaviors. Perhaps it is reasonable to think the fundamental object could intersect without disturbance. Otherwise how would the light from the most distant galaxies ever reach us? This property could also help explain neutrinos. How is it that billions of neutrinos supposedly pass through our bodies every second without interacting? Well maybe neutrinos refer to twists of the Thread that end on atoms of different galaxies.

So I would say that this property and behavior of the supposed Thread is a natural wonder. A sort of pleasant surprise at the end of the road in terms of physics. Unfortunately modern physicists had made this issue way too complex and this IMHO has led them to some absurd conclusions. For example Wilczek thinks the pull between quarks (whatever those are) increases exponentially with distance.

I don't pretend to have all these difficult issues figured out, but its a never ending journey because conceptualization has no limits. Who knows maybe someone in the future will make a new and perfect conception.

* Critical density is a concept found in some 19th century works and is used by Gaede to explain proton.  It could be defined as an overlap or intersection of Thread through which no more Thread can penetrate.

** Inertial mass is a seminal concept in Newton's work.  It could be defined as a proton's resistance to being pushed or pulled by other proton's in the vicinity.  The resistance originates from all protons (or H atoms) of the Universe.  When a proton (or H atom) is moved in a given direction by the proton's in the vicinity, for example in what we call gravity, the same is pulled in the opposite direction by all other atoms of the Universe.  Inertial mass is always in the direction opposite the pull of gravity.  Inertial mass resolves to the critical Thread density of all protons, the inherent connection of all proton's by way of twined Thread constantly torquing, as well as the unique configuration and sideways motion of electron thread.  Electron thread bursts out sideways in relation to the proton since the EM Ropes constituting the H atom seem to be set up in such a way that on one end say the north pole, the EM Rope torques Clockwise and the other end, say the south pole, the same EM Rope torques Counter Clockwise.  This enables Thread to burst out sideways from the proton in the concept called elementary charge or simply electron.  The electron thread can be conceived to 'begin' as an arc, turn as a loop and then if fed more Thread at high frequencies, twist up into a double helical form. From there we can begin to conceive chemical bonds, cathode rays, Compton scattering and all sorts of other micro phenomena.

But if the crisscrossing EM Rope spun in one direction at the location of convergence then we would be talking a neutron and not an H atom.  The EM Ropes constituting a neutron torque in one direction, in integer values, thus there is no elementary charge of Thread (or electron).  The EM Rope of a Hydrogen atom spins in opposite directions in half integer values, thus an electron thread bursts out sideways in relation to the proton.  This is what one can call electron, elementary charge, or the reeling mechanism.  It is the Hydrogen atom is able to constantly reel in and release Thread maintaining constant pull between all atoms through the dynamic motion of what we call electron.  For each Hydrogen atom there are gazillions of electron threads paired to an equal number of threaded electric axles constituting the proton.  Pending circumstances this electron thread can take on all sorts of double helical forms, work levels, lengths, etc. My plan for the future is to draw many illustrations of the electron threads because pictures are worth a thousand words.   And much more could be said about the Thread and has been said in Gaede's excellent work called Why God Doesn't Exist.  

Hair according to Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich

I haven't done a religious post in a while. I am still working on my interpretation of Genesis 1:3, etc. which I call the light-event. I also want to do a series of illustrations explaining what I think is the electron. But in the meantime here is a quote from Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich from her recorded visions that has always struck me. She is describing Adam and Eve before the Fall:

Their hair fell in five glittering tresses, two from the temples, two behind the ears, and one from the back of the head.

I have always thought that by the Wounds of Jesus, there were opened anew in the human body portals closed by Adams sin. I have been given to understand that Longinus opened in Jesus' Side the gate of regeneration to eternal life, therefore no one entered Heaven while that gate was closed.

The glittering beams on Adams head denoted his abundant fruitfulness, his glory, his connection with other radiations. And all this shining beauty is restored to glorified souls and bodies. Our hair is the ruined, the extinct glory; and as is this hair of ours to rays of light, so is our present flesh to that of Adam before the Fall. The sunbeams around Adam's mouth bore reference to a holy posterity from God, which, had it not been for the Fall, would have been effectuated by the spoken word.

Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich should be made a Saint. Like yesterday.

The Half Integer Value of the Spin Quantum Number

Now that I have a new, and what I think is a rational, physical interpretation of the electron, the half integer value of the spin quantum number seems deeply significant. In a fundamental interpretation it could describe the location where EM Rope (considered as a single close looped whole) spins in reverse directions. Links of EM Rope re-twist in reverse and that is the electron.  At these locations, the EM Rope redirects itself, it transforms. Hence the inverse function or inverse work. Without this opposition hydrogen atoms would be impossible. I think mainstream calls this the weak interaction, but they have no object such as Thread or Twined Thread to explain it.  And to be quite frank, light and the electron do not interact since each of these in their context refer to concepts.  At the electron, the fundamental entity, the Thread, twists in reverse directions, and superposes, aligns with the converging EM Rope that imparts form to the proton.  A critical number of these superposing EM Ropes and electron thread is a location where they influence one another.  They turn one another CW or CCW, and this is a primal light event.  I call this Critical Ethereal Thread Anomaly.    

But where two opposite spinning signals along the Twined Thread meet at the proton . . . a single closed looped magnetic thread protrudes outward. Two opposite spinning signals of the Twined Thread equals one of an electron double helix, four two, six three, and so on until we have the unit mass of the hydrogen atom (and not to mention a new source of tension a.k.a inertial mass).  For 2 two EM Ropes there is 1 electron thread.  Or in terms of mainstream, we assign photon a value of 1 and electron a value of 1/2. The Thread itself has no spin value and this they validated in the Higg's Boson project without defining or understanding what they are verifying or validating.  In any case, this would be an alternative way to interpret the half integer value.

When we added the + and – signs then we would be describing the dynamics of a double helical thread in its excited and/or ionized state. A twist of the electron double helix in one direction (+, CW) equals the absorption of two light signals (or reel in of two links) coming from opposite directions along an adjacent EM Rope. So the corresponding electron double helix builds itself upward, winds up. Two twists in one direction equals the absorption of four and so on. The two incoming signals pressing in from both sides could correspond to various wavelength and amplitude of EM Rope thus an electron juts out in different trajectories which seem unpredictable or improbable and this is the origin of Born’s uncertainty principle, but the electron is not literally ‘smeared between two states’. That is sheer nonsense and a failure of the founders of quantum mechanics to imagine light and the electron. If a laser is used to induce a hydrogen atom to excitation or ionization then many double helices may beam out along the same imaginary axis and interfere with each other since many electric axles of the proton could be aligned along the same imaginary axis (note that the assumption is that the hydrogen atom is a crisscrossing convergence of EM Ropes coming from all the atoms of the Universe).

One twist in the opposite direction (-, CCW) equals the emission of two signals (or release of two links) bidirectionally along an EM Rope. So the corresponding electron double helix collapses downward, or winds down.

I’m sure there are other ways to interpret the spin quantum number.  For example the switch between half integer to integer values (1/2, 1, 3/2, etc.) if we multiply s by n where n = 1, 2, 3, etc. could represent the emission and absorption of light signals. In this scheme an integer represents a new link built up in the double helix, a half integer before it represents the absorption signal needed to build up the new link.  When a new link is built up a light emission occurs because a torque is bidirectional motion.    


my rough illustration of an electron double helix (not to scale)

And I now think the whole shell/subshell concept is bunk as is the orbital idea. I think these ideas mislead. The threaded magnetic loops or electron threads that constitute the electron are things that jut out. Heck they blitz out.  A spiked clothing of light around the proton. And the value of the electron ideally equals one because each electric axle of the proton has a threaded double helix structure protruding out from it . . . charging out from it. When they came up with the value of one they didn't realize that the electron in its context refers to a concept. If there are 2 gazillion electric axles of the proton in a single hydrogen atom there are 2 gazillion magnetic loops or double helices protruding out (note: Each threaded double helix has its own EM field and intrinsic magnetic moment because of its structure and rotation). In any case, divide them and you get one. One in my understanding would signify unity, stability, completeness, wholeness, etc.

The Helical Electron

In hydrogen, the electron moves under the electromagnetic influence of the proton. (Rigden, Hydrogen the Essential Element, p. 251)

A rough draft of my new physical interpretation of the electron. I've got a lot crammed into this picture, but essentially when one of the links of a tightly tied rope like entity is pressed in from both sides a loop forms. From this I conceived that the electron must spiral upward into a double helix like structure with a closed tip:



So I just assume that the electron for say a hydrogen atom is a nest of a gazillion magnetic loops inseparably linked to electric axles of the proton. These fork out from converging EM Ropes coming from all the atoms of the U. These looped magnetic threads spiral upward and downward, constantly twisting signals similar to light and in fact inducing light. It is only when they are pulled out to great lengths that they form arcs and combine to produce magnetic fields which structure persists with time because light signals have to slowly push them back into a loop. But this can be delayed by getting stuck on protons.

Not that most people, even physicists would care, but this conception of the electron has great explanatory power. It should be able to work with most if not all the famous experiments done on hydrogen and the electron. It should be able to work with some famous math equations like Dirac's and Schrodinger's. Notice how it literally takes on the shape of a rectilinear ray or beam.  An electron, literally, is a twisted ray of thread.  An electron blitzes outward from the proton at great speeds.  These beam like structures can twist signals of various frequencies and so they are fittingly called radiant matter by Sir William Crookes. They basically have the same form and motion as light postulated and explained by Gaede in EM Rope Hypothesis and Thread Theory.

This structure and motion of the electron would explain the supposed wave/particle duality of the electron. The tip or the twists could be able to apply pressure meanwhile the form is inherently wavy!  One can see similar forms in some diagrams of a solution for Schrodinger's equation.  The closed tip could get redirected by a magnetic field or by a proton, in other words diffracted.

This unique triple twined structure and motion is able to illustrate the conservation of energy and momentum.    

This form has parallel and anti-parallel 'lines' inferred in the magnetic moment experiments and predicted by Dirac's equations. The motion explains the torque inferred in the magnetic moment experiments. The form also has inherent angular moment, and a spin up in one direction and spin down in another direction. The electron literally winds up and unwinds down.  It has Bohr's energy levels in discrete values. Each twist is what mainstream calls a photon or a particle. It explains Dirac's sea of photons/particles in the electron cloud. It is sad.  Mainstream thinks, or has been led to think, that particles are spontaneously created and annihilated when these so called virtual particles are really the threaded magnetic helix continuously twisting up and down at various frequencies.

My conception also shows how the electron charges outward and collapses. Really the tip is twisted outward in relation to the proton but this value is much weaker than the charge, i.e. rushing motion, of the proton since the proton is comprised of more Thread.

Most importantly this form is able to generate push and pull simultaneously. It is able to pull in and push out light signals along the parallel EM Rope worked into the assumption of light and gravity. It provides a mechanism whereby the Thread could be reeled in and released out.  The electron can form new links of thread perpendicular to the proton.  And again as I have mentioned numerous times on this blog, Nature is continuous.  The fine structure works, continuously via the Thread configured in a rope like form to and from atoms as well as through atoms.
       
This form and motion of the electron could help explain a host of phenomena, such as electricity, atomic magnetism, some modes of ionization, some gamma and X signals, Compton scattering, light relay, chemical bonding, aurora, lightning, superconductivity, Cherenkov Radiation, photoelectric effect, pair production and a host of other phenomena, foremost electricity. It also gives something of an interpretation of those weird spirals seen on the particle physicist's reconstructed bumble chamber images.  

Nuclear Radius and Charge Radius

For all practical purposes nuclear radius and charge radius are synonymous.

Charge radius is a concept they use in their electron scattering experiments, the first of which was done under Rutherford's direction. All they did was emit helium ions at gold foil. After this experiment they knew that some central region of the atom is impenetrable. Rutherford surmised that the atomic center is the seat of an intense electric field and came up with the name Proton (literally meaning first). Since then they have measured the size of this impenetrable 'electric field' to be about 0.8775(51)*10-15 m.

But the question remains, what is it that they are measuring???? A field refers to a concept. Concepts relate objects. So what is it that causes atoms to deviate from their normal trajectory when they come close to this 'electric field'. What is a proton? What is its form? What is it comprised of?  Meanwhile there is this very nebulous concept called charge. What does charge relate???

Around 1997 Gaede came up with a mercurial model and assumption of the Hydrogen atom. He supposed that the proton is a crisscrossing convergence of electric threads coming from all the atoms of the Universe. So the proton is shaped like a star.  It is an intersection of electric threads. I have many pictures of the proton in previous posts on my blog. Some of these are reconstructed images of the proton done by the very scientists who use billion dollar equipment and yet do not understand what the proton in reality is.

Under Thread Theory assumption, as we approach the center of the proton electric thread density increases. The location where all the electric threads converge is impenetrable. There is a critical density of thread through which no more thread can pass. Thus when Rutherford's Helium ions came close to the gold atoms they were redirected. Essentially what happened was the tips of the magnetic threads of the Helium ions crossed paths with the critical density of electric threads of the gold atoms. A gold atom is a fusion of 79 hydrogen atoms. Thus there should be 79 impenetrable locations clustered in the center of a gold atom. For all practical purposes we can call these protons or the nucleus, but it is extremely important to note that these protons are not discrete entities. Protons are symmetrical and continuous entities. Their structure is supplied by EM Ropes coming from all atoms of the Universe. Gazillions of EM Ropes coming from all atoms of the Universe fork out to straight electric thread/axles and magnetic thread arcs. These are inseparably paired. The Magnetic Arcs oscillate as well as spin around their paired electric axle.  For the motion of the magnetic arcs of the electron shell we like to use analogies such as pumping and jump roping.

Rutherford et al could not locate every single impenetrable location with their experiment. They just assumed a conceptual charge radius. The way the word 'charge' was used meant that this relates a fundamental interaction within the network of matter. Force, that is push or pull can only work with a critical density of Thread in at least one of the objects of the interaction. Thus a proton can push through thread or pull thread, usually that arced thread of an electron. It does not carry charge, rather it charges, like a horse. Horses don't carry their gallop. They gallop. Protons don't carry their charge. They charge. And they can change location by shifting along the electric axles of which they are made. This is probably what the scientists detect as nuclear spin, at least for the Hydrogen atom.  As we move around the periodic table proton spin could be induced by some spinning magnetic arcs of the electron. In any case a proton can move toward or away from any atom of the Universe to which they are connected via their electric axles.  They slide through EM Rope and induce it to torque.   

Sklar on Newton's Force

Here is an excellent quote I found in the library last week:

From Philosophy and the Foundations of Dynamics by Lawrence Sklar (2013)

For Cartesians Newton’s force is, of course, a terrible Aristotelian throwback. It is an “occult quality” that objects possess in and of their nature. For example, all objects, merely by virtue of having their inertial mass, also have what would now be called “active gravitational charge.” They possess the property of affecting the motion of other objects by exerting a gravitational force upon them. (p. 93)

The invocation of the notion of force in the Newtonian sense immediately leads to controversy over what such an element of the world ought to be taken to be. Is force some primitive quality of things? How do we grasp its nature in the world? What is the status of the term used to refer to? Here we see the continuation of a long-ongoing puzzle about fundamental theories. How do we interpret those concepts of the theory that are introduced in its explanatory apparatus in a manner that is internal to the theory, not imported into it from pre-existing language. The concepts relating to the position of things and their variation in time seemed to most of the physicists to be unexceptionable – at least until their “absoluteness” is claimed! But how do we grasp the meaning of “force” as used in Newtonian dynamics, where it has ceased to be merely some measure of a quantity of motion? (p. 115)

The question Sklar poses at the end has never really been answered, at least not in mainstream established physics. In physics force is a verb meaning push or pull. So we always have to ask ourselves what physical entity is doing the pushing or the pulling? What is mediating the push and pull between atoms? We can describe push or pull in an infinite number of ways and this is obvious with all the descriptive forces coming out of the physicists since Newton, e.g. nuclear force, Lorentz force, Van Der Waals force, etc. But we always come back to the fundamental question: WHAT is doing the pushing or the pulling in between. What object is mediating gravitational force between atoms? Electromagnetic force??? Without a hypothesized object doing the pushing or the pulling it is impossible to explain force.  And so the forces are fittingly described as occult, and so can particle physics, quantum mechanics, physical cosmology, relativity, etc. be described as occult.  They do not understand what they are describing.
   

The Thread of Thread Theory

One cannot detect the twined EM Threads, directly, with the eye since 1. they are microscopic & 2. they are supposed to mediate light phenomenon to and from the atoms of the eye. Also, the EM Ropes and even more fundamentally the Thread can intersect, converge, superpose, or pass through another similar without any hindrance to their motion. This idea has been a stumbling block for some, but it is consistent with observation and experiment, e.g. pass two lasers through one another.

Something similar has been noted by renown scientists of the past and up to this day; only we assume that a unique fundamental object intersects and performs without disturbing another similar. So for example EM Ropes can cross right through other EM Ropes or the arced Magnetic Threads of the Electron can pass through one another as they spin around the nucleus. It is only when we have an intersection or overlap of so much thread at a location that another moving thread may get disturbed, hindered, stopped, redirected, reformed, etc. This critical overlap is exemplified by the proton which is a crisscrossing convergence of gazillions of taut and straight electric threads fed by the EM Ropes coming from all atoms. Protons of course are very powerful and durable.

The critical density can also be exemplified by the arced magnetic threads of heavier atomic elements. The tips of a gazillions magnetic threads could briefly converge as they spin.  This would temporarily render that location impenetrable. This may have something to do with the magnetic moment. And then when we consider the human body obviously the skin is composed of a high density of thread and so alpha (a helium ion) easily gets stopped.

Here are some quotes (but note Maxwell and Huygens are stuck in wave mentality):

Maxwell: “ Equation (361) for the electromagnetic field is linear in the field,… this means that two waves can travel through each other without disturbing each other” (J. Maxwell, On Physical Lines of Force, Philosophical Magazine 21 (1861))

Huygens: “ Another property of waves of light, and one of the most marvelous, is that when some of them come from different or even from opposing sides, they produce their effect across one another without any hindrance…the waves do not destroy nor interrupt one another when they cross one another” (C. Huygens, Treatise on Light (1678) trans. S. Thompson (1912) p. 22)

Grosseteste: "Corporeity, therefore, is either light itself or the agent which performs the aforementioned operation and introduces dimensions into matter in virtue of its participation in light, and acts through the power of this same light. But the first form cannot introduce dimensions into matter through the power of a subsequent form. Therefore light is not a form subsequent to corporeity, but it is corporeity itself.

Furthermore, the first corporeal form is, in the opinion of the philosophers, more exalted and of a nobler and more excellent essence than all the forms that come after it. It bears, also, a closer resemblance to the forms that exist apart from matter. But light is more exalted and of a nobler and more excellent essence than all corporeal things. It has, moreover, greater similarity than all bodies to the forms that exist apart from matter, namely, the intelligences (i.e. Angels). Light therefore is the first corporeal form." (Robert Grosseteste, De Luce)

The medieval philosopher Robert Grosseteste was onto something here. Notice how he compares this first corporeal form---which for us is basically synonymous with the EM Ropes---with angels and God. These are his believed supernatural forms that exist apart from the network of matter.

So what is obvious to me is that the Thread is unique.

lasers pass through each other unimpeded