Non-Locality

I parsed emeritus professor John W. Moffat's book, Cracking the Particle Code of the Universe.  The definition he uses is about the same one as one finds on the net. Nonlocality is synonymous with action-at-a-distance. The concept refers to a direct action between two separated objects, say atoms or stars, WITH no perceivable mediator, agent, or nexus or any perceivable mechanism. Notice the word perceivable. Some definitions modify with perceivable and others do not.

Einstein described the quantum non-locality of so called quantum entanglement as "spooky action-at-a-distance". Before him, Newton whined that action-at-a-distance is "so great an Absurdity that I believe no Man who has in philosophical Matters a competent Faculty of thinking can ever fall into it". It is only an absurdity if no mediator is supposed to connect the two separated objects that are stated as a matter of fact to be in direct action.

One of the core strengths of EM Rope Hypothesis and Thread Theory is that to attempt to address these issues of non-locality. Direct action between two objects separated at great distances WITHOUT some sort of mediator of a mechanism is irrational. How is an electron that moves in one location suppose to influence the electron across the Universe without some inherent physical connection, mediated by a real object?  Nature doesn't perform miracles like God.  Angels don't mediate atomic electron transition.
So we need to suppose and visualize a nexus, or an agent, or a mediator, that connects these two atoms and make manifest how it works. This mediator must be an object with form. It must have some unique properties like it can superpose with another similar to it. It can wave and yet signal like a particle. Even two mainstream boson sparticles, are suppose to overlap and share the same quantum state, whatever the hell that means in reality. They supposedly transmit action-at-a-distance and are called force-carriers. These sparticles carry verbs like push and pull. On the other hand two or more fermions supposedly cannot overlap. In Thread Theory we have our own terms like EM Rope, Thread, Critical Thread Density, electron thread, magnetic thread, electric thread, etc. Atoms and stars are already connected by mediators constantly activated by atoms which account for a mechanism. The underlying assumption is that a single closed looped entity underlies all the atoms of the Universe. Matter is a web, and atoms serve as matrices.

Bosons are very roughly like Thread or EM Rope. Fermions are very roughly like Critical Thread Density or derive from a CTD. Thread Theory notions of proton, neutron, electron are completely different then that of mainstream Standard Model. Suppositions and explanations are also somewhat different. Mainstream seems to want to continually divide up a supposed fundamental entity and its similar yet radically distinct opposite in the atom, as well as their actions it into hundreds, even thousands of categories and state these categorical particles as if they were proven fact (when they cannot even be perceived), even going so far as to name one type of particle a 'wino'. Lol . Mainstream also seems to want to treat concepts as objects. Mainstream also tries to thrive off of ambiguous, ill-defined, and irrational concepts such as wave-particle duality, spin-orbit, superposing quantum states. Much of the problem of mainstream modern physics is communication (which individuals and organizations are at fault for).

On the other hand Thread Theory takes a non-pluralistic approach and strives to live up to a clear cut and cutthroat rational analysis and critical thinking. Plurality should not be posited without necessity. Concepts should be clearly defined. One should be able to visualize and give illustrations, make movies, and be ready to answer for them (as lowly and as simple as they maybe). One should be able to provide some reasonable explanation for action-at-a-distance, other than having to circumvent and lead the audience into a maze of literally millions of ill-defined concepts, absurdities and circles. One should be forthright.

It is not as if rigorous modern research, experiment, data-collection, technology, math equations etc. aren't neat and a great starter but someday someone has to start to put the pieces of the puzzle together and try to clearly explain just what the hell is happening. There must be a somewhat reasonable and unified explanation that can be worked out here. Marshaling relevant information provided by all sorts of scientists is important. Brainstorming is very important. Critical thinking and rational analysis is important. Thinking outside the box: important. Understanding the difference between an object and concept is important. Trying to get back to that attitude that you are child-like and detached from fame, status, qualifications, money, etc. is important. Striving to be a sort of like a renaissance man is important. Explanations stand or fall on their own merit. Having a good attitude and not being extreme is important.

Electron Bubbles?

Electron Bubbles

You are creating all the bubbles at night
I'm chasing round trying to pop them all the time
We don't need to trust a single word they say
You are creating all the bubbles at play

--Biffy Clyro, Bubbles

These are my rough brainstorms and I know that my pictures look like garbage, but I'm not going to spend hours on this.

Electron Bubble refers to a concept conceived by mentally-ill quantum mechanics and particle physicists. The referent of 'electron bubble' lacks form, and cannot possibly exist. They are appearances, or patterns conceived from an empirical analysis of the chamber. One could say electron bubble is synonymous with space but this is misleading and ultimately useless.

What roughly happens is 'electron' threads are injected from an electrode into a group of super-cooled helium atoms contained by a metallic canister. In the canister, helium atoms are cooled to what they call a liquid state. This merely refers to a relation of helium atoms where they are just shy of stationary in reference to one another. In other words the helium atoms aren't travelling far in relation to one another like one would except of a gaseous relation. Their relation is more liquid or solid like, but there is no bonding between the atoms.  Just low frequency light signals exchanged between them via EM Threads inherently connecting the Helium atoms to one another.

When a beam of gazillions of electron threads are forced into the canister of super-cooled helium atoms, what happens is that helium atoms wedge the beams, thus splitting the beams into subsets of electron thread and these press against the helium atoms and get redirected in circular, spherical or all sort of patterns between the CETD locations of the helium nuclei. These electron threads form a pattern akin to mishap-pen cocoons. So a cocoon would IMHO be an analog, not bubble. Many countless of these cocoons of electron thread form between the helium atoms and may temporarily separate the helium atoms, a little. The helium atoms in a liquid state contain the electron threads.  However, some electron threads might even tunnel through helium atoms and back through cocoons. Thread is interfaced throughout the canister and worked in all sorts of directions. If the current is kept up some cocoons will push helium atoms aside and appear to move to the bottom. If more electron threads are burst into the chamber more cocoons will temporarily form. If the electron threads of the electrode are induced to burst in at higher speeds and numbers perhaps some electron thread of the helium atoms will be pulled out of the nucleus.

electron bubbles are like cocoons of electron thread forming between the super-cooled Helium atoms

In reality, electron must refer to a temporary location where and when 'electron' thread crisscrosses, overlaps, superposes to a critical density. This enables that location to temporarily participate in light phenomenon and enables that threaded location to be pushed or pulled on by incident magnetic or electron threads all of which are twisted in helices, are inherently wavy and ultimately rooted back in proton. The anti-parallel crosses or twists of thread running along electron or magnetic threads or EM Ropes, account for the particle like behavior.  These threads can push and pull on atoms, specifically locations of the atom that have attained critical thread density (all fundamental interactions of the Universe involve Thread, and at least one Thread in the interaction must have attained critical density: an intersection, overlap, or superposition of Thread through which no more Thread may penetrate).  When a beam of gazillions of these electron threads is lead into a chamber . . . the helium atoms, specifically the locations of helium atoms that have attained critical thread density, force the beam to split up, sort of like roots growing out of the main root. These continue to whirl around the chamber until bubbles begin to appear (note I said appear).

The electron threads must also need EM Ropes to cross through so as to attain a critical thread density (this would certainly be the case in a metallic chamber, there would be countless EM Threads crossing through and intersecting). This maybe why their precious electron is measured as 1/1836 the mass of a proton. There are less electron threads involved in the CETD relation as opposed to the critical thread density location at 'proton'.

There is no splitting of wavefunction into parts or any of that mumbo jumbo. In addition since thread is being redirected in all directions there will be some crisscrossing of electron thread through cocoons. They may temporarily establish a CETD which can signal light to an observer (because all the atoms of the observer are connected to all the atoms of the objects of the experiment); and the physicists might gleefully think that they have captured, contained or isolated an electron.

"Here is some of the b.s. coming out of the quantum mechanics/particle physicists mouths:

"Electrons . . . only exist as oscillations . . . they exist as a wave function, or a probability distribution."

[Me: impossible for oscillations and wavefunctions to exist. Wave and oscillate refers to the action of electron threads.]

"If the physicists are correct, then some of the wave function pieces must actually hold the electron and others do not. It may be possible in the future to narrow down the location of an electron. Dividing and trapping pieces of the wave function can increase the likelihood of finding the electron."

[this is how mentally-ill they have become. They imagine themselves dividing and trapping pieces of a concept: wavefunction]

Read more at http://guardianlv.com/…/could-quantum-mechanics-change-fo…/…

"Experiments led by Humphrey Maris, professor of physics at Brown, suggest that the quantum state of an electron—the electron's wave function—can be shattered into pieces and those pieces can be trapped in tiny bubbles of liquid helium."

"Electrons are elementary particles, indivisible and unbreakable. But what the researchers are saying is in some ways more bizarre."

[this is true, to divide a probability into pieces is more bizarre and they take pride in their insane thoughts. What they have failed to realize is that their electron refers to a crisscross, overlap or superposition of gazillions of thread. If a set of these threads is unreeled from a metallic atom and focused into a beam that collides with adjacent atoms then it can be divided into multiple subsets that continue to move around.]

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-10-function-electron.html#jCp

So then . . .

Giggles then dribble from my lips.
Bubbles to breeze. Thousands.
Not one popping. Bubbles forever.
Just floating forever.
Popping forever.

From Mark Z. Danielewski's Only Revolutions

Some crude visual aids:

In summary: Classically, bubble refers to atoms in a liquid relation containing atoms in a gaseous relation. In this conception of electron bubble helium atoms crunched together in a so called liquid state split, redirect and contain the injected beam of electron threads so that they temporarily cocoon between the helium atoms. However vice verse some of these cocooning electron threads contain helium atoms pushing up against them and in addition can tunnel through the helium atoms and back through the cocoons. Of course both helium atoms and electron threads are contained by the metal.

So bubble may be an analogy, but the mathematical physicists have electron bubble defined as the empty space created around a free electron in a cryogenic gas or liquid of helium or neon. That just doesn't cut it. The helium atoms are not containing discrete electron balls (unless those balls are continuous convergences of electron thread).  And it is clear from the descriptions that something more is happening here than meets the eye.

Helium Dreams (Hairy Head Model of the Atom)

Some crude ideas about the Hairy-Head model of the atom.  

Feynman debates fundamentals of Science with Dawkins, Krauss, Tyson... a...

The rock stars debating the great whore called 'science'.

"That which is added to what is observed, Attempts to simplify the overwhelming complexity."

"That which is added to what is observed, Attempts to simplify the overwhelming complexity."

by Erik Cortes

Not math, but visualization is the language of Science

New video from Mike Huttner.

This is an excellent video. Mike makes a brilliant rational analysis to find the root of knowledge, understanding and perhaps even wisdom from a natural point of view.

Visualization is supreme in intellectual life. Our brains continually visualize. And without objects there is no seeing or understanding.

And not only in science but even in religion. From a religious viewpoint even God respects and uses our ability to visualize. I believe God stimulates visualization, especially in say the elect prophets. We have visionaries, like Isaiah in ancient times and Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich in more modern times. "Vision of the valley", "tell the vision to no one" "I saw this", "I had a vision" etc. God makes movies in the brain of the visionaries. And of course there are also false and evil visionaries.

But vision is a key concept in the Bible and in the Judeo-Christian religion and I hope it is not completely lost in Roman Catholic Faith. This is a prime way in which God communicates and helps us to understand or to know. According to Blessed Anne, some ancients Jews even taught that Adam and Eve had some mode of primitive vision stimulated by God which they lost when they sinned. When I pray to Jesus or Mary, I am in some manner visualizing them.

Religion aside, visualizing is of paramount importance in science. Think of Watson and Crick visualizing DNA as a double helix.

We also need to visualize the atom and that fundamental entity that underlies all atoms and enables it to initiate and perpetuate light and electron phenomenon. This is the very core and heart of physics.     

The Hairy Head Model of the Atom (Gold)

Introducing the Hairy Head Model of the Atom.

If Thomson's "Plum Pudding" was an alpha model, "Hairy Head" is omega. Rutherford, who thought that most of the atom was empty space would be stunned by something like this.

This model is based off of Gaede's Thread Theory, his concept of proton, my concept of electron, and mixed with the idea of critical thread density (an intersection or overlap of Thread through which no more Thread may pass) and some ideas developed by friends at my nuclear physics forum at facebook.  Not to mention the host of insights given by many scientists over the years.   

Pathways leading into the nucleus are due more to proton pattern and the corresponding distribution of electron threads around the nucleus. Shorter electron threads collect to force a critical density in heavier atoms thus making division. They superpose to establish temporary critical densities in so called heavier atoms. These critical thread densities are built in resistors.  And yet the electron threads to separate into factions making an atom like gold a decent conductor.   As we move away from the shorter double helical electron threads, there is a host of longer free electrons that move with great ease and can bond with other other gold atoms when heated and then cool to a lattice pattern.  The high mobility of longer electrons threads is why gold is soft, malleable, ductile, etc. However the pathways seem narrow thus gold is the least chemically reactant at least at normal temperatures.

Below is another image of a gold atom at extreme temperatures. You notice that the groups of electron threads are more disturbed and displaced widening the pathways.

from Brookhaven's Flickr account

When atoms start vibrating and colliding in dynamic heat relations, longer more mobile double helical electron hairs get displaced or combed to the side or disturbed etc. This leaves the nucleus exposed so that electron hairs from other atoms can easily latch onto protons and rotate them.

Pathways leading into the atom widen as the atom is induced to move more rapidly in heat phenomenon. Atoms with shorter electron hair like helium are less mobile and grouped together closer because of the simplicity or symmetry of the helium nucleons. And so there are no pathways left open for chemical bonding. Helium is practically non reactant. One has to do some crazy stuff to it in order for it to bond.

Let us just say that gold atoms are heated in the crucible and start bonding. Electron hair oscillates in groups and pathways widen leaving the nucleus exposed so that many electron threads of other gold atoms may enter and latch onto protons. Many electron hairs are potentially shared between gold atoms. When they slow down to room temperature the pathways narrow as the hair relaxes to a more ordinary position. And the gold atoms form a lattice consistent with the proton pattern.

When iron is heated, electron hair oscillates as atoms rotate around and collide. This is how electron hairs get stuck in protons and curved around from our fictitious North to South poles (as in polar covalent bonds).

I think this atomic model is far better than the shell concept, cloud concept, solar system concept, plum pudding, etc. In reality these other models don’t work even if they helped produce technology and fine experiments. Like I said above Hairy Head could be the omega model.

In addition, this model is aesthetically pleasing and easy to grasp. Just imagine a woman with long hair skipping around and her hair starts waving, leaving parts of her head exposed. Helium has short hair like a man. Its great!

Finally this is a real physical interpretation. It is not mathematical or purely conceptual. The hair is just an analogy. The fundamental entity that torques into double helical electron thread has different properties and behaves a lot different than human hair.  I have described some of these unique properties and behaviors in previous posts.  But in reality I assume there are countless double helical electron threads of various lengths bursting out sideways from the proton pending atomic element, much like a human head of hair. The higher the atomic number the more strands of electron hair. Noble gases leave no pathways exposing the nucleus even when they vibrate and collide in heat relations. Hydrogen has fairly long electron hair and the least amount of hair leaving it highly reactant.

The above images were recreated from Brookhaven's Heavy Ion Collider. The folks there seem to think that these images represent quark-gluon plasma (whatever that is). I disagree with them. Thus I doctored the first image and gave my own interpretation. Brookhaven National Lab is funded by the division of Nuclear Physics of he U.S. Department of Energy and many other governments. Since they use our tax dollars, I hold the opinion that I can publicly give my interpretation of their trillion dollar images without monetary or any other sort of profit. This is only for educational purposes. 

In any case, just remember to ask your local quantum mechanic or particle physicist which of the gazillion electron threads, 20 gazillion twists of electron thread, or gazillion electric axles that he is trying to locate in and around the nucleus. Good luck with that.



My crude, primitive and idealized concept of electron. The proton shifts into critical density charging the Thread. Essentially what happens is that the magnetic cable of EM Rope reverse twists at the proton.   

Another idea




Another commentary on a Brookhaven image: